For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Every documentation page is also served as markdown: append .md to its URL or request it with Accept: text/markdown. A single-file snapshot of all docs is at llms-full.txt.

Alloovium

Exchange

Gestion de versions pour les documents de construction

Alloovium Exchange traite un contrat, une spécification ou un plan de gestion comme un système de contrôle de version traite du code source : chaque révision est capturée, les modifications de chaque partie sont attribuables, et chaque lecture et accusé de réception sont consignés dans un journal d'audit en écriture unique.

One contract's full revision cycle in Exchange — the approved amendment previewed with its version history (the supplier's Rev B current, the issued original beneath), and the activity rail recording every step: shared with a note, opened, submitted, sent back with a revise-and-resubmit note, revised, resubmitted, and approved — each stamped with who and when.

Video · ~3 min

Send, sign, and keep the receipts

One document's full round trip through Exchange: pick it from project files with the slide-over preview, send it across companies, watch the recipient open the share link, accept and sign in place, then land on the hash-chained audit trail showing every event.

Ce que c'est

Exchange est la couche documentaire de la suite Alloovium. Elle est construite autour de la révision — pas du dossier, pas de la pièce jointe d'un e-mail, pas de l'horodatage SharePoint.

Elle fonctionne avec DOCX comme format de première classe ; les PDF sont pris en charge dans la visionneuse pour les flux de lecture et d'accusé de réception.

Pour qui

Les entrepreneurs principaux qui gèrent les paquets documentaires des sous-traitants sur les chantiers d'infrastructure australiens. La traçabilité d'audit à trois couches (personne, organisation, accréditation) est ce qui distingue Exchange d'un flux par suffixe de nom de fichier.

Capacités

Quatre surfaces produit, toutes ancrées dans le même journal d'audit en écriture unique :

  • Diffs au niveau des clauses — voyez ce qui a changé entre deux révisions DOCX, clause par clause — pas glyphe par glyphe.
  • Annotations des corps de métier, fusionnées — les corrections de chaque sous-traitant remontent sur le maître de l'entrepreneur principal, les conflits étant signalés à la clause qu'ils touchent.
The trail behind a shared document — the status ladder from editing to approved, and the activity list recording who signed, sent back, started work and shared, each stamped with the person and date, with the original send note quoted.

Receipts

The point of sending through Exchange is that the send leaves a receipt. Every step in a shared document’s life is written to an append-only trail — recorded once, never edited, never deleted — so “we never got that” stops being an argument and becomes a lookup.

  • Sent and opened— each share records when it went out and when the recipient first opened it, giving you a timestamped record of notification per counterparty. These facts also feed the project’s Distribution register.
  • Every state transition — shared, submitted, sent back with a note, resubmitted, approved: each move is logged with who made it, when, and the note that travelled with it, including the review outcome stamped on the transition (approved, approved-as-noted, revise-and-resubmit, or rejected).
  • Signatures bound to the bytes — when a document is signed at approval, the trail records who signed and a SHA-256 hash of the exact file as published. The signature row survives as evidence even if the document itself is later deleted, and the hash proves the signed file was not swapped afterwards.
  • Honest tracking only — open receipts are shown only for channels that actually support them. A document that went out by plain email is never dressed up with a read receipt it does not have.

Timestamps decide real money

In Sharvain Facades v Roberts Co[2025] NSWSC 606 (upheld [2025] NSWCA 161), a subcontractor uploaded a $3,207,999.03 payment claim at 7:18pm on a Friday; the head contractor’s after-5pm deeming clause was held void and its payment schedule was one business day late — judgment for $3,278,043.27 including interest. When service and response windows are in play, a timestamped trail of what was sent and when is the whole ballgame.

For the who-holds-which-revision view built on these receipts — including winding the record back to any past date — see the Distribution register.

Où aller ensuite