COMMERCIAL
SOPA payment schedules
Under Australian security-of-payment legislation, a payment claim you don't answer with a valid payment schedule inside the statutory window becomes a debt for the full amount — disputed parts included. Alloovium takes the incoming claim, walks you through a line-by-line assessment against the record, and generates the statutory schedule with the deadline computed correctly.
Overview
A payment schedule is the respondent's side of the security-of-payment machine: the formal response that says what you will pay, what you won't, and why. It is one of the few documents in construction where the deadline itself is the entitlement — serve it a business day late, or not at all, and the legislation deems you liable for the whole claim regardless of its merits.
Alloovium's generator treats it that way. When a payment claim comes in, the clock is computed from the statutory rules for the state — in business days, holiday-aware — the claim is assessed line by line against your project record, and the schedule is generated as a formal document with your assessment and reasons on it, ready to serve inside the window.
What missing the window costs
The consequences are not theoretical; they are the point of the legislation, and the courts apply them mechanically.
- In Manariti Plumbing v Universal Property Group [2025] NSWCA 135, no payment schedule was served — the result was summary judgment for the full $221,901 plus interest and costs. The claim was held valid despite alleged defects, and s 15(4) barred every defence.
- In Sharvain Facades v Roberts Co[2025] NSWCA 161, the head contractor's payment schedule was one business day late — its contract clause deeming after-5pm service to land the next day was void under the Act — and judgment followed for $3,278,043.27 including interest.
- The failure mode is common enough to show up in the regulator's numbers: of 990 NSW adjudication applications lodged in FY24-25, 212 were withdrawn and 44 timed out — “timed out” being pure record-and-deadline failure, before any adjudicator reached the merits.
Liability is automatic, not argued
Miss the window and the disputed parts of the claim are owed alongside the undisputed ones. There is no do-over: the schedule either exists, on time, with reasons — or the claim becomes a debt.From incoming claim to served schedule
The claim lands
The incoming payment claim is captured against the project, and the statutory response clock starts — visible, in business days, with the due date computed for the relevant state.
Line-by-line assessment
Each claimed line is assessed against the record: what was instructed, what was delivered, what the contract says. Lines that don’t hold up — dayworks never instructed, a variation never approved, quantities that don’t match delivery records — surface for your decision.
Scheduled amounts and reasons
For every line you certify below the claimed amount, the schedule records the scheduled amount and the reason for withholding — the content the Act requires for the schedule to do its job.
Generate and serve
The statutory payment schedule is generated as a formal document. You review it, then serve it the way you serve anything — and if you send it through Exchange, the served-on receipts come with it.
The assessment is yours; the generator's job is that nothing required by the statute is missing, nothing is served late because someone was counting days on a wall calendar, and every reason you give is one you can stand behind at adjudication because it points at the record.
The statutory window, computed correctly
Security-of-payment deadlines run in business days, and business days are jurisdiction matters: public holidays shift real due dates in ways a naive calendar count gets wrong. The generator computes the response deadline holiday-aware for the state the project sits in — a deadline that would land on Good Friday does not fall due until the next business day, and the clock you see reflects that.
Why a day matters
Sharvain turned on exactly one business day. When the margin for error is a single day boundary and the downside is the full claimed amount, the day arithmetic is not an administrative detail — it is the entitlement.
Certifying down on the record
Certifying a line below the claimed amount is a commercial decision that should leave a trail. When you certify down, the schedule records the claimed amount, the scheduled amount, and the reason — and that assessment lives on the project record, not in a spreadsheet on someone's desktop. If the claimant takes the line to adjudication, your position and its basis are already written down, dated, and consistent with what you served.
Reasons now, not reasons later
Under the East Coast security-of-payment model, an adjudication response is generally confined to the reasons given in the payment schedule. A reason you didn't state when you served the schedule is a reason you may not get to argue later — which is why the generator asks for reasons at assessment time, line by line.Coverage
| Jurisdiction | Status |
|---|---|
| NSW — Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 | Supported |
| QLD — Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 | Supported |
| Other Australian states and territories | Not yet supported |
NSW and QLD today
The generator currently covers New South Wales and Queensland. Projects in other jurisdictions can still assess claims against the record and draft responses through document generation — the statutory clock computation and schedule form are what the coverage above refers to.